Soy usuario registrado hasta la version 7.0.1, este mismo numero de registro puedo aplicarlo a la version 8.1.1? There's no difference in this between Windows 98 and XP. In Agnes Bernauer, you should be able to move cards back from the foundation piles to tableau, all except for the very first card on each foundation pile, which is fixed once played. In the WXP version this can only be done in certain cases, seemingly illogical. >For example in the W95/98 version of Agnes Bernauer one always can move cards freely between tableau foundations piles and tableau piles. Error?ĭet later som ett svenskt namn, sa jag tankte skicka Dig en halsning fran en solitaire-spelande landsman i North Carolina. For example in the W95/98 version of Agnes Bernauer one always can move cards freely between tableau foundations piles and tableau piles. There are some differences between last version an the old W95/98 version. In any event, I wouldn't consider QC the most interesting game in the world. I think this might be the only game with a rule like that. This is regardless of whether AutoPlay is on or not. Note that QC has some weird rules - particularly, if the top card of the waste pile can be played to a foundation pile, it must be and the game will do it automatically. I was able to make legal moves without any problem. I just tried QC and it works fine for me. It resists legal card shifts and then, in a stuttering manner, initiates its own transfers! >I tried QC the other night and, after about 8 games (such a fast study) realised that it is flawed, Thomas. Weird! It's absolutely disconcerting and, the first time or so, you can't quite comprehend what came about. It resists legal card shifts and then, in a stuttering manner, initiates its own transfers! It's as if the cards are not properly identified. I tried QC the other night and, after about 8 games (such a fast study) realised that it is flawed, Thomas. Is there a possibility of a "move counter", or some other method of determining "the winner" (besides a stop watch)? There is no "winner" though as neither will quit until they have beaten it. My husband and I like to challenge each other in PGS (particularly in Spider). You can also click on Register in the upper right corner and select a username and password to have an actual logon. You can post as Anonymous, or put something in the name box without a password and it will post as that. >I didn't realy want to be anon but can't I just provide the user name? ![]() I didn't realy want to be anon but can't I just provide the user name? Is there a way to bucket the losers rather than clear all the scores? Oh, rats, I guess that that would invalidate the competetive lists, where I'll never live! ![]() With new games, I amass big losing scores before winning a game. How about some strategy tips per game? Although I'm mathematically challenged I'm addicted to Patience/Solitaire. I have a 28.6 on three blind mice, but have only played 7 games.43 to go! I suspect it would be possible to do a lot better than 20%, but I also suspect there are impossible positions. The best anyone has been able to do is about 20%. No, I would say that there are many impossible Three Blind Mice games. >Can all the games on "Three Blind Mice" be solved? Ĭan all the games on "Three Blind Mice" be solved? The latest version of Pretty Good Solitaire is version 8.1.1. This is the area for questions about Pretty Good Solitaire.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |